| Welcome to The Arab League, one of the longest established Dundee United Football forums, with many members from the old ArabFC forum. New members are always welcomed, so to join the debate, just sign up - registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join The Arab League! If you're already a member please log in: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Opinion on the new SPFL | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 12 2014, 03:20 PM (1,116 Views) | |
| Cobardon | Aug 13 2014, 10:47 PM Post #16 |
|
Uncle Smurf
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I love the idea of someone working in economics called Shiller. Yes, it's a modern phrenology. The last crash should have shown that to all. That it hasn't shows an impressive cognitive dissidence among its adherents. |
![]() |
|
| Setenza | Aug 13 2014, 11:12 PM Post #17 |
|
Knitting with only one needle
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Or more likely, the economists on each side of the spectrum used the crash to prove why they were right. |
![]() |
|
| Naebody | Aug 14 2014, 08:04 AM Post #18 |
|
Twat
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
With respect, that kind of argument doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 1. What are economists for? They study the economy, quantify its characteristics and identify causalities. Sometimes they'll predict things, but only in the sense that they attach likelihoods to a range of potential outcomes. 2. Historians are still struggling to understand the causes and catalysts of the credit crunch five years after it happened. That shows the difficulties of predicting it five years earlier. Nevertheless, lots of economists wrote about the various systemic dangers. There are ones you read about, like Roubini, and plenty you don't, like Warburton and -- yes! Isn't his name ironic! -- Shiller. 3. So why were the doomsayers in the minority? Well, had it been a consensus forecast among economists that a crisis was about to happen, the forecast alone would've triggered it. The nature of financial crises is that they're unexpected -- but that doesn't mean they're unpredicted, just nonconsensual. Some outcomes will be considered relatively unlikely against other outcomes, and they'll still have been relatively unlikely even after they occur. This is all a bit like being dealt a royal flush: it's demonstrably statistically improbable. So when it happens, does it prove statistics is charlatanry? 4. Much of science is studying the behaviours of rocks and stuff. Economics is studying people's behaviours, and people are more complicated than rocks. Does that complexity make attempts to quantify their behaviours a bogus science? That seems defeatist, and also a tad disrespectful to the people who've spent their lives trying to improve our collective lot this past 2,000 years. Because god knows, very few got personally wealthy from it. To quote Mark Buchanan at Bloomberg:
There's a full discussion of the "economics as empirical science" debate here |
![]() |
|
| vvhatsthatonyourback | Aug 14 2014, 08:49 AM Post #19 |
|
wild eyed
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We don't organise our society around unproven theories of biology, Naebs. Judged even by its own standards, not a straw man argument of it being a science, economics and prominent economists have a horrible record of explaining events, never mind predicting them. Yet they are still taken seriously enough that they define the politics of many a nation. There are some very interesting things going on at the fringes of economics right now, such as your pet Chartalist sect and others looking at the basics of money, currency and economics. However, the mainstream of economics, which is essentially the free market neo-liberalism that has been an article of faith, continues along as if nothing has happened. |
![]() |
|
| Naebody | Aug 14 2014, 08:52 AM Post #20 |
|
Twat
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Agreed. |
![]() |
|
| vvhatsthatonyourback | Aug 14 2014, 08:58 AM Post #21 |
|
wild eyed
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I came here for an argument, not to be agreed with. This is the last you'll hear from me. I'm off to EastFud full time now. I'm going now. Goodbye. That's it, I've gone. Really this time. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · Any Football · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2





![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



7:20 PM Jul 11