Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

    Search       Member List      Official United Site     ArabZone      ArabTRUST       BBC Sport     Twitter
Welcome to The Arab League, one of the longest established Dundee United Football forums, with many members from the old ArabFC forum.

New members are always welcomed, so to join the debate, just sign up - registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join The Arab League!


If you're already a member please log in:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7
Rangers v Dundee United; Sat 5th Nov, 3pm
Topic Started: Nov 1 2011, 08:41 AM (5,083 Views)
whatsthatonyourback
Member Avatar
Waldo Jeffers
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Ivan
Nov 2 2011, 09:30 AM
whatsthatonyourback
Nov 2 2011, 09:14 AM
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 09:04 AM
lumping women such as SJP into the category of unattractive when at most they're slightly unconventional against the cheerleader archetype only exacerbates the problem. I mean, she's married to Ferris Bueller for f*ck sake.
I hope that misogynist Ivan is reading this and burning with shame.
Simmering with confusion rather than burning with shame.

Perhaps you have me confused with someone else. Someone altogether less nice.
Just testing. I'll let you away with it this time.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cobardon
Member Avatar
Uncle Smurf
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
The Eggman
Nov 2 2011, 09:47 AM
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 09:04 AM
But if anyone can name a pre-menopausal leading lady they wouldn't stick based exclusively on aesthetics then I'm interested.
Sarah Jessica Parker around the time of Sex and the City. She looked nice enough in that horror, LA Story.

Hilary Swank, at any time. She looks like Matt Damon.

Uma Thurman. Has an SJP look about her. But taller, and more butch.

Sissy Spacek. Mia Farrow. They were leading actresses back in the day, weren't they?

I presume unattractive doesn't necessarily equal character actor, as well.
Shelly Duvall. If you can think of a more physically unappealing female lead I'll be keen to hear who she is.

Assumedly we're also forgetting that Glenda Jackson was one of the top actresses of her generation and even did a romantic comedy or two. Glenn Close was certainly cast for her sex appeal in 'Fatal Attraction' surely, despite being a bit of a munter.

Barbra Streisand.

Meryl Streep.

Up to date...Tilda - lest we forget - Swinton. Great actress but physically...well, no. You wouldn't, would you?

Emma Thompson too for that matter...she's not ugly, but certainly not anything you wouldn't get on any high street.

None of these women would turn heads anyway, were they not movie stars.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
findus
Member Avatar
Jerry Kerr
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
The Eggman
Nov 2 2011, 09:47 AM
Hilary Swank, at any time. She looks like Matt Damon.
I'm quite partial to the odd turbo-wank over the aptly named Hillarys Wank, not classically beautiful but sexy as wank. That, and she'd be handy in a stramash.

Posted Image

Homer, can you do me the smiley honours, please.
Edited by findus, Nov 2 2011, 11:56 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
findus
Member Avatar
Jerry Kerr
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Cobardon
Nov 2 2011, 11:30 AM
Shelly Duvall. If you can think of a more physically unappealing female lead I'll be keen to hear who she is.
I'd also like to throw Jodie Foster's name in there for our celebration of Mordorwegian leading ladies. All those spikey, angular, sharp features :smack:
Edited by findus, Nov 2 2011, 11:55 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Naebody
Member Avatar
Twat
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
Tilda Swinton

Independent lead or Hollywood supporting cast. She's 50 and has never, to my knowledge, fronted a potential blockbuster in the same way you'd expect Zach Galifianakis or Larry David to. See also Frances McDormand, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Joan Cusack.

Quote:
 
Sissy Spacek; Mia Farrow; Shelley Duvall; Glenda Jackson; Glenn Close; Barbra Streisand

From another generation, where things were a bit more sane. When was the last time any of these people had their names on a holiday season poster?

Quote:
 
Meryl Streep

Note, I said pre-menopausal.

Quote:
 
Jodie Foster

Marmite, sure, but a hundred obsessive stalkers can't all be wrong.

Quote:
 
Hilary Swank; Uma Thurman

f*ck off.

Quote:
 
I presume unattractive doesn't necessarily equal character actor, as well.

You presume wrong. For women it's essentially the definition.

Still nil nil.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ivan
Member Avatar
F*cking plebs.
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 12:43 PM
Quote:
 
Jodie Foster

Marmite, sure, but a hundred obsessive stalkers can't all be wrong.


Posted Image


Man, she's twelve and a half years old.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cobardon
Member Avatar
Uncle Smurf
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 12:43 PM
Quote:
 
Tilda Swinton

Independent lead or Hollywood supporting cast. She's 50 and has never, to my knowledge, fronted a potential blockbuster in the same way you'd expect Zach Galifianakis or Larry David to. See also Frances McDormand, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Joan Cusack.

Quote:
 
Sissy Spacek; Mia Farrow; Shelley Duvall; Glenda Jackson; Glenn Close; Barbra Streisand

From another generation, where things were a bit more sane. When was the last time any of these people had their names on a holiday season poster?

Quote:
 
Meryl Streep

Note, I said pre-menopausal.

Quote:
 
Jodie Foster

Marmite, sure, but a hundred obsessive stalkers can't all be wrong.

Quote:
 
Hilary Swank; Uma Thurman

f*ck off.

Quote:
 
I presume unattractive doesn't necessarily equal character actor, as well.

You presume wrong. For women it's essentially the definition.

Still nil nil.
I can see those goalposts ever shifting.

If the deal is that a rather average looking woman can't co-star in a Michael Bay flick then you're correct.

But that wasn't what you said, nor implied. McDormand is almost the exact equivalent of Philip Seymour Hoffman, right down to the Coen roles (though he's probably not cast because he's shagging one of them*).






*Probably.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Naebody
Member Avatar
Twat
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Cobardon
Nov 2 2011, 02:09 PM
McDormand is almost the exact equivalent of Philip Seymour Hoffman, right down to the Coen roles.
There's one notable difference. Hoffman is usually a good each-way for "best actor" when the ceremonies come around, whereas McDormond is nearly always found in the "best supporting actress" envelope. Why?

Don't assume the goalposts are where they're not. All I'm saying is that Hollywood favours physically attractive women in a way that it doesn't with men. This is hardly a radical, challenging or original observation. See the "average Joe gets improbably hot woman" trope, which is the backbone of the US broadcast media whether it's a film, sitcom, news show or cartoon.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Morvant's Finest
Member Avatar
Tommy McLean
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Speaking of Peter Griffin, he once described SJP as having "a face like a foot", undoubtedly harsh, but still makes me laugh heartily.

The distinction between actors like Glenda Jackson and Sissy Spacek being from another era is a good one to make Naebs, very hard to think of any recent "unconventional looking" actresses in similar leading roles.

BTW while we're on feminist movie principles, anybody heard of the Bechdel Test for female characters in movies? Supposedly very few films pass the test...

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Eggman
Member Avatar
Tommy McLean
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 12:43 PM
Quote:
 
Hilary Swank; Uma Thurman

f*ck off.
Why f*ck off? Do you mean that they're clearly very attractive women regardless of their celebrity stature?

There's generally accepted...rating of a person's looks, and then an individual rating. So if you polled 100 people about Brad Pitt, say, then perhaps he would receive (based purely on looks) an 8/10. There will be individuals who aren't particularly taken by his looks, and rate him 5/10. Obviously some of those ratings would change over time, as people's looks change. Either way, neither Swank nor Thurman would get near the top 'fittest' women in terms of a general rating.

Anyway, for me, neither are better than 5/10.

There are women that you could look at and say you'd want to swap saliva with them without even swapping a word. Many guys would happily do that with women who they rate as 5/10. Personally, I'd be wanting higher than that for anything not involving conversation. Jenny Agutter, in American Werewolf in London, for instance, could be mute and I'd still want to swap a copious amount of spit with her. Or Jessica Lange in King Kong. But for me to exchange oral bacteria with Uma Thurman looks, then I'd need to get to know her.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Eggman
Member Avatar
Tommy McLean
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 12:43 PM
Quote:
 
Meryl Streep

Note, I said pre-menopausal.
Would you say she's very attractive in Sophie's Choice, or The Deerhunter (desperate situations and characters notwithstanding)?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The Eggman
Member Avatar
Tommy McLean
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 03:11 PM
Don't assume the goalposts are where they're not. All I'm saying is that Hollywood favours physically attractive women in a way that it doesn't with men.
To an extent. Look at the success of Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp, Keanu Reeves*, George Clooney and Tom Cruise - all of them more than cringeworthy, and none of them with five percent of the acting ability of far less successful actors who will never get a leading role.

*Keanu f*cking Reeves. Jesus.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Naebody
Member Avatar
Twat
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
The Eggman
Nov 2 2011, 04:32 PM
neither Swank nor Thurman would get near the top 'fittest' women in terms of a general rating.
Pish.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Morvant's Finest
Member Avatar
Tommy McLean
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Renee Zelwegger?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cobardon
Member Avatar
Uncle Smurf
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Naebody
Nov 2 2011, 03:11 PM
Cobardon
Nov 2 2011, 02:09 PM
McDormand is almost the exact equivalent of Philip Seymour Hoffman, right down to the Coen roles.
There's one notable difference. Hoffman is usually a good each-way for "best actor" when the ceremonies come around, whereas McDormond is nearly always found in the "best supporting actress" envelope. Why?

Don't assume the goalposts are where they're not. All I'm saying is that Hollywood favours physically attractive women in a way that it doesn't with men. This is hardly a radical, challenging or original observation. See the "average Joe gets improbably hot woman" trope, which is the backbone of the US broadcast media whether it's a film, sitcom, news show or cartoon.
That simply isn't true, though. Both have had the one notable lead role (which both won best actor for) and a screed of nominations for 'best supporting' across the awards lists.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Any Football · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7

Find this theme on Forum2Forum.net & ZNR exclusively.