United's Finances

Welcome to The Arab League, one of the longest established Dundee United Football forums, with many members from the old ArabFC forum.

New members are always welcomed, so to join the debate, just sign up - registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join The Arab League!

If you're already a member please log in:

Pages:
1
2
3
4

United's Finances; 2011/12
Tweet Topic Started: Aug 24 2011, 10:53 AM (2,766 Views)
Cobardon	Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Post #46
Uncle Smurf Posts: 1,768 Group: Members Member #16 Joined: September 12, 2010	Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'.



reekie	Oct 20 2011, 11:21 PM Post #47
lum raker Posts: 3,201 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: September 16, 2010	Cobardon Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'. Nail. Head. Hit. You may not post as much as I'd like, Cob, but by Jove, when you do it's worth it. Gawd bless ya, guv.



Skeletor	Oct 21 2011, 12:29 AM Post #48
Most likely to be Ann Widdecombe Posts: 2,157 Group: Members Member #10 Joined: September 10, 2010	Cobardon Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'. Absolute nonsense. He was vocally rejoicing, on a public plane, that condoms had spread AIDS, and you and the other passengers kept quiet merely with disapproving looks on your faces?



Skeletor	Oct 21 2011, 12:37 AM Post #49
Most likely to be Ann Widdecombe Posts: 2,157 Group: Members Member #10 Joined: September 10, 2010	reekie Oct 20 2011, 11:21 PM Cobardon Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'. Nail. Head. Hit. You may not post as much as I'd like, Cob, but by Jove, when you do it's worth it. Gawd bless ya, guv. And I can only assume that you feel that this one unclear anecdote somehow verifies your previous thoughts on priests. Ignorance is bliss I suppose, I'm happy you're happy.



findus	Oct 21 2011, 06:41 AM Post #50
Jerry Kerr Posts: 4,444 Group: Members Member #2 Joined: September 10, 2010	Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. Causes AIDS =/= help further the spread of HIV (or AIDS). Edited by findus, Oct 21 2011, 06:43 AM.



findus	Oct 21 2011, 06:42 AM Post #51
Jerry Kerr Posts: 4,444 Group: Members Member #2 Joined: September 10, 2010	Skeletor Oct 21 2011, 12:29 AM Cobardon Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'. Absolute nonsense. He was vocally rejoicing, on a public plane, that condoms had spread AIDS, and you and the other passengers kept quiet merely with disapproving looks on your faces? The article rejoiced =/= priest rejoicing at article. Skellie, have you been drinking, squire? Edited by findus, Oct 21 2011, 06:43 AM.



reekie	Oct 21 2011, 07:58 AM Post #52
lum raker Posts: 3,201 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: September 16, 2010	Skeletor Oct 21 2011, 12:37 AM reekie Oct 20 2011, 11:21 PM Cobardon Oct 20 2011, 10:49 PM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 08:04 PM The Eggman Oct 20 2011, 09:24 AM Skeletor Oct 20 2011, 12:26 AM theres a disproportionate focus on "the Pope" as a subject of criticism, when there are plenty more religious leaders and even corporate aristocrats worthy of at least equal target. Who, then? And which of them have as much influence, and help further the spread of HIV, as well as increase homophobia and other discriminatory issues? This post is just so retarded you're going to have to start another thread in the non-football section entitled "The Pope causes AIDS" so I can comprehend it and leave this thread to football finances. I once flew down to Bristol on a plane crammed with priests (a la 'Flight into Terror') and the cleric in front of me was reading 'The Catholic Herald' or some such: the article he was at rejoiced in the headline 'How Condoms Spread AIDS'. Nail. Head. Hit. You may not post as much as I'd like, Cob, but by Jove, when you do it's worth it. Gawd bless ya, guv. And I can only assume that you feel that this one unclear anecdote somehow verifies your previous thoughts on priests. Ignorance is bliss I suppose, I'm happy you're happy. I've no idea why you're digging this particular hole, Skellie, perhaps you're just ~~tripping~~ trolling away, having a good old giggle. Nevertheless, a simple Google of condoms+africa+catholic+church gives you a whole host of material to catch up on. Like, for instance, this one, or this one. And including, for balance, this one. edit - changed the predictive 'tripping'. Although, that may have been prescient. Edited by reekie, Oct 21 2011, 08:02 AM.



Naebody	Oct 21 2011, 08:02 AM Post #53
Twat Posts: 5,210 Group: Members Member #20 Joined: September 13, 2010	Really? Really? Condoms prevent AIDS. But Pope thinks abstinence prevents AIDS and condoms prevent abstinence. Ergo, Pope's a doughnut. End of.



reekie	Oct 21 2011, 08:05 AM Post #54
lum raker Posts: 3,201 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: September 16, 2010	Naebody Oct 21 2011, 08:02 AM Really? Really? Condoms prevent AIDS. But Pope thinks abstinence prevents AIDS and condoms prevent abstinence. Ergo, Pope's a doughnut. End of. Aw fuck, Naebs. Just spent ten minutes copy-and-pasting (which is a birch on a smartphone) and you run him through with four sentences. Bubble-burster... edit - for 'birch', read 'bitch'. Sassin', frassin', touchscreen... Edited by reekie, Oct 21 2011, 08:07 AM.



findus	Oct 21 2011, 08:41 AM Post #55
Jerry Kerr Posts: 4,444 Group: Members Member #2 Joined: September 10, 2010	Naebody Oct 21 2011, 08:02 AM Really? Really? Condoms prevent AIDS. But Pope thinks abstinence prevents AIDS and condoms prevent abstinence. Ergo, Pope's a doughnut. End of. Removing pope sensitivities from the discussion for a moment, we could reword to: Clean needles prevent AIDS. But Jammy thinks not injecting prevents AIDS and clean needles prevent not injecting. Ergo, Jammy's a doughnut. End of. Thank you, thank you



Naebody	Oct 21 2011, 09:22 AM Post #56
Twat Posts: 5,210 Group: Members Member #20 Joined: September 13, 2010	findus Oct 21 2011, 08:41 AM Clean needles prevent AIDS. But Jammy thinks not injecting prevents AIDS and clean needles prevent not injecting. Ergo, Jammy's a doughnut. End of. That'd only be a fair analogy if we'd all been born with a permanent heroin-firing syringe attached to our groins.



findus	Oct 21 2011, 10:06 AM Post #57
Jerry Kerr Posts: 4,444 Group: Members Member #2 Joined: September 10, 2010	Naebody Oct 21 2011, 09:22 AM findus Oct 21 2011, 08:41 AM Clean needles prevent AIDS. But Jammy thinks not injecting prevents AIDS and clean needles prevent not injecting. Ergo, Jammy's a doughnut. End of. That'd only be a fair analogy if we'd all been born with a permanent heroin-firing syringe attached to our groins. Very true, which is why I thought it was pretty implicit in my analogy that I was talking about those already addicted. Obviously not! Edited by findus, Oct 21 2011, 10:07 AM.

Create a free forum in seconds. Learn More · Register Now
« Previous Topic · Any Football · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4